Bilingual Education Essay

The presence of multilingualistist students in U. S. rails is signifi digestt and the impart of internal and external historical featureors. Educators and policy startrs must consider their motives and emf contri saveion to our computer professionalgram line system. The multiplicity of lyric poems and the complex nature of multilinguals renders a mixed but exciting fosteringal field for research, design, and genteelnessal innovation. Unfortunately, spoken communications bend intricate in political battles, dragging the direction and the hereafter of innocent children into such(prenominal) conflicts.Indigenous inhabitants, colonizers, and immigrants to the United States defend and continue to represent a conversion of words backgrounds. Like it or not, the United States is highly multilingual. Fashions in exploitation actors line in gentility and attitudes toward multilingualistism keep back underg unitary many changes since the United States became inde pendent. During the sign colonization of the United States, European settlers used the quarrels of their countries of origin. The Continental Congress considered cut and German of the essence(p) for political purposes.It recognized the need to disseminate data among disparate populations to broaden the cause of independence (Heath, 1976). The settlers established schools that educated their children in their witness languages, curiously French, German, Spanish, and Swedish, while teaching side as a second language. Schools that used slope as the medium of instruction taught one of the separate European languages as a second language ( Keller & avant-garde Hooft, 1982). The presence of many languages in U. S.schools was an accepted reality until the 1870s. impertinentlyspapers, schools, and societies provided instructional abide for diverse languages (Heath, 1981, p. 7). There was, however, concern for seeking a common language, especi everyy to conduct establishment a ffairs (Heath, 1981). The original colonies and territories incorporated later into the confederacy comprised local governments that used different languages, such as German in Pennsylvania, French in Louisiana, and Spanish in fresh Mexico and California. face, nevertheless, always compete an important role in the unrestricted life of the colonies because from the beginning England colonize the United States. The form of government embraced after the American Revolution reflected English values (Conklin & Lourie, 1983). Economic and historic factors helped solidify the position of English as the language of government. During the first half of the 20th deoxycytidine monophosphate, English was imposed as the language of instruction in most states. As many as 34 states enacted laws mandating English as the language of instruction.Other languages were forbidden and teachers could be fined or jailed if found using them No polyglot conglomerate of the old world has d ard be as rut hless in noble a single language upon its whole population as was the imperfect republic dedicated to the proposition that whole men be created equal ( Johnson, 1949, pp. 118-119). Political, social, and economic rationales for denigrating all languages new(prenominal) than English advanced linguistic and cognitive theories that attacked multilingualistism. Public schools quickly adopted a sink or submerge attitude during the first half of the 20th century.Special programs such as English as a Second row (ESL) served yet adults. The impudence was that children nab languages easily and nothing special needed to be done. Nevertheless, disrespect the lack of public support for bilingualist training, there were bilingual programs mostly dual language programsin private and parochial schools. These schools extended the essential curriculum to include instruction in the pagan, linguistic, and religious heritages of the particular social group. A great estimate of them were bilingual (Fishman & Markman, 1979).National interest in bilingual statemental activity spread when Title VII, the Bilingual Education arrange (an amendment to the Elementary and Secondary Education Act) was enacted in 1968. This national legislation provided specie to create bilingual programs in poor school districts (Lyons, 1990). The rival of the federal law, twain good and bad, was widely felt. A number of states reversed the laws that permitted English as the completely language of instruction by passing bilingual tuition legislation. Massachusetts was the first state to enact such a law with its Transitional Bilingual Education Act (1971).More than 20 other states followed Massachusetts example by creating transitional bilingual precept programs (August & Garcia, 1988). Evidently, during the past two centuries, use of languages in education has been much and more(prenominal) politicized. fib has perennial itself but in modified ways. The acceptance of lang uages in education observed in the early part of the 19th century was unembellished once more in the 1970s but languages other than English appe bed in schools with a much lower status with respect to English than they had a century earlier.The imposition of English only at the turn of the century reappeargond in the 1980s, although this cadence only if about nonage students were served by special English language programs rather than leaving all to sink or swim. Efforts to make English speakers fluent in other languages charter also seen ups and downs. qualm toward foreigners in the early part of the century discouraged second language learning. Interest in foreign language learning following populace War II wavered in the 1970s.The pendulum is swinging again in favour of bilingualism for English speakers. Foreign language programs argon starting earlier in elementary schools and bilingual education programs that promote bilingualism are becoming increasingly popular (Met & G permitay, 1992). However, most triumphful bilingual programs have been created not by legislative mandates but by concerned educators and communities working to add upher. Good education for bilingual students should not be the prohibitedcome of compliance with legislation.Schools must be go awaying to create good programs suitable for all students, including bilinguals. To overcome shield to implementing bilingual education, many communities resort to politics or lawsuits to force school districts to provide bilingual education. However, political solutions create their own problems, paradoxically via media and rigidity. For example, laws and regulations that impose a 3-year maximum for students as veritableing bilingual education programs arose as a compromise between the forces for and against bilingual education. question shows fourth dimension and again that students profit from long-term bilingual instruction, correct though some students who collar shorter periods eventually succeed in mainstream education (Kleinfeld, 1979). Consequently, it is clear that historically Americans have not showed great tolerance to linguistic diversity. There have been repeated efforts to make English an official language in the country by restricting bilingualism, as well as attempts to enhance more ESL programs on the other side. There is an ongoing disagreement regarding whether or not ESL program meets its initial objective, the ways it affects American companionship, and its necessity.The opponents of bilingual teaching argue it is high-priced for the country, keeps immigrants socially isolated, slows down the assimilation process, creates a retreat of an official language and dissolves the unity of America. Generally, a lot of people form controvert assumptions more or less bilingual programs based on their ideological beliefs, political views, personal observations, contradict experience or simply generalizations and stereotyping based on limited n oesis about ESL classes (Rojas, 2003). These judgments unremarkably lack evidence and logical thinking, and thus cannot objectively analyze the programs weaknesses or disadvantages.As Maria nipping observes, Much of the debate on bilingual education is politically motivated, more suitable for talk shows than for improving schools (Rojas, 2003). And indeed, ESL programs are viewed more as a tool to solve multiple social problems (which, certainly, are also important) minority groups unspoilts, language diversity, melting pot, the unity of the country, a curse to the existence of possessive culture, and so oninstead of focusing on the quality of education our school-age population is receiving and the environment they are placed in.Policymakers should definitely pay more attention to the programs educational rough-and-readyness and dramatic advancement in students academic progress when deciding whether public schools need ESL classes. Because public schools have quite a sign ificant influence on childrens learning and personal development, we are responsible of making it a commanding schooling experience for all students despite their ethnic background or aboriginal language.Bilingual education helps students to learn English faster, provides a social learning environment, improves academic progress, encourages kids to become skilled in two languages, teaches cultural awareness, and preserves minorities linguistic human rights. It has been proven that students who are enrolled in bilingual classes have better scores on standardized tests, such as the ACTs and SATs, than those who are not enrolled in bilingual classes. Bilingual education is beneficial for our country and enables students to learn English as well as keeping their native tongue for future success in our international economy.Bilingual education works in our society and should stay intact within the schools and should be funded to enable students who wish to dramatize these classes s hould be able to. However, it is not the question of whether bilingual programs work (obviously they do), but more the question of how our society addresses cultural and linguistic diversity. Recent studies have proven that bilingual teaching dramatically increases students educational progress twain in English communicational skills and other content in curriculum.Students who attend a regular English class right away usually fall behind in subjects taught in English and experience negative consequences in psychological development. ESL system doesnt disregard the need for learnedness of English indeed, it one of the most important outcomes of effective bilingual education programs (Zehr, 2004). Looking at the money played out on bilingual education program (when money are being cut off from other public work across the country) may bear to consideration of abolishing bilingual system and focusing on the projects that affect all students in education system instead.The United States spends approximately $12 billion on bilingual education each year (Wood, 1997) and over $100 million was spent to study the effectiveness of ESL programs (Mujica, 2003). Because American taxpayers dont arrive at from bilingual instruction directly, many communities and states are un go awaying to pay that expense and are quick to cut back regardless its potential positive results. Nevertheless, even though we give up other things that could be otherwise purchased, bilingual programs in public schools is a critical factor in foreign students learning process.Besides the fact that bilingual teaching dramatically increases academic performance, it also encourages more parents to send their children to school and that, in turn, motivates more students to become educated. In other words, the money spent on ESL programs should not be associated with an opportunity cost of ignoring other important problems. Instead, it is a valuable enthronement in students success at school as we ll as assimilation into American society. The secrete of bilingual education in human relationship to our orbiculate economy enables students enrolled in these classes to have a better future than those students who only speak English.Jeff MacSwan, supporter of bilingual education and assistant prof of curriculum and instruction at Arizona State University, is quoted about bilingual education in our global economy when he says, Multilingualism is an plus, and Arizona must embrace it (MacSwan, 1998). Arizona Senator John McCain also believes that bilingual education is an asset to children. He states that, Arizona should strengthen them (bilingual classes) and make similar resources available to all children (MacSwan).In fact, McCain has introduced a program that enables students to be in programs like these. McCains program is called English-Plus (MaSwan) which acknowledges the great importance of bilingualism in our modern global economy. McCain is quoted concerning bilingual education when he says, People should not have to abandon the language of their birth to learn the language of their futureThe tycoon to speak languages in addition to English is a tremendous resource to our community (MacSwan).In addition, the benefits of bilingual education in our global economy can be seen when US Secretary Richard Riley said, When they enter the work force in some(prenominal) years we will regret the inability of our children to speak two languages. Our global economy demands it our children deserve it (Pratt, 2000). Undoubtedly, in addition to educational advantage, adult bilinguals with a complete grasp of two or more languages, can be more successful economically and benefit more to their communities than their single-language peers.Our public services employ staff as translators in order to keep informed of the constantly growing immigrant population. Increased marketable skills are an advantage of bilingual fluency. Because of the aforementioned educatio nal advantages, bilinguals can offer a flexibility and take of problem-solving ability that surpasses the average monolingual. According to Graciela Kenig, author of The Best Careers for Bilingual Latinos grocery Your Fluency in Spanish to get Ahead on the Job, employers are looking for people with a broader scope of experience and strong problem-solving ability. (1998, p. 5). The grocery is also focusing on the global economy. Bilinguals are uniquely capable to give the U. S. a competitive edge. The utilization of well-educated American bilinguals can give our country a significant advantage in the global marketplace. In aspect of Rudolph Giulianis view that bilingual education doesnt work and that it is too expensive should be better thought out and he should look at the benefits that come from it. Giuliani was quoted regarding bilingual education by saying, Its cruel to them and gives them less of a chance to succeed (Willen, 1998).Giuliani has some reason to argue that it is too expensive considering that New York City whole spends $300 million annually on its program serving 126,000 students (Chavez, 1995). In addition, Giuliani has a reason to argue that bilingual education it too time consuming considering the outrageous number of students who are eligible for bilingual classes. Although these are good reasons Giuliani should realize that, half the Latino children in bilingual classes (New York City) are American-born. And many- if not most- speak English better than they do Spanish (Chavez, 1995).The number one reason why these students are enrolled in these particular classes is because that New York automatically places these students in these classes by whether or not they score in a higher place the 40th percentageile on a standard eyes test. These tests should not be done because it is evident that the students are learning English just maybe not as fast at other students. Giulianis claims are somewhat relevant but he should consider all o f the benefits that come from bilingual education. Although Giuliani believes it is too expensive this should not be an issue considering that our country can benefit as a whole with multilingualism.During the restricting Period (1880s-1960s) the need of being able to effectively reach in English was motivating immigrants to learn the language and assimilate into society (Ovando, 2003). virtuoso language was meant to unify the members of a society (Schaefer, 2003, p. 66). However, today conformity to a single language would probably be regarded as racist (Mujica, 2003). Currently, most people would rather agree with Eliana D. Rojas, an assistant professor of bilingual education, that the right to concord ones native language and culture is a part of a persons human rights (Mujica).The main reason so many people protest attempts to implement bilingual programs in public schools is a belief that such step will lead to dissolving the unity of the country. The government provides fu nds for translators in most government organizations which allow immigrants to function in their own language, doesnt encourage foreigners to learn English and thus isolates them from the rest of the community. In response, they are more apt(predicate) to form a small group or even a subculture within the dominant society with different norms, values and language. We cannot assimilate and we wint one day proclaimed the executive director of the unify of United Latin American Citizens, an organization originally supporting pro assimilation (Mujica, 2003, p. 2). According to the Census statistics in 2000, 18 percent of American population over the age of 5 speaks a language other than English as their primary language (Schaefer, 2003, p. 65), while 8 percent of them are classified as limited English proficient (Mujica, 2003, p. 2). Hispanic population is the fastest growing minority in the U. S. and large separate of the country are becoming increasingly Latinized.Americans feel st rangers in their own neighborhoods and aliens in their own country (Schaefer, 2003, p. 66). It may look like to begin with or later we will have to say Hasta la fit to the United States and Adelante to Canadian-style discord over the issues of language and ethnicity (Mujica, 2003, p. 4). Therefore, blaming such programs as bilingual instructing in schools is based primarily on nationalistic concerns. The recent studies have proven, though, that only a small percent of children attending bilingual classrooms will still be able to communicate in their native language in a few years (Worthy, 2003).In some ESL classes students are actually encouraged to maintain their first language and are introduced to elements from both(prenominal) American and their native cultures. It faces apparent that a child will more probable associate himself or herself with other immigrants rather than Americans and it may seem hard for that student to assimilate into American society. It may be tricky for him or her to learn English later because any language cannot be taught successfully in isolation proficient communicational skills can only develop through everyday practice and a practical need to apply new knowledge.In reality it takes about the same time for a person to learn English in the all-English class than in stages switching from the native language to the regular English instructing. Despite the fact they differ in the length of the transition to English and how long they allow students to remain in bilingual classrooms, all ESL students receive enough practice and even become monolingual English speakers pretty soon, as a yearlong study of fifth-grade children attending bilingual class has proven (Worthy, 2003).As the teacher encouraged students to read, write and speak Spanish, most of them were losing their ability to communicate in Spanish and had English as their dominant language both in school and informal situations. The study concludes that at a certain time social and peer pressure are more important for children than family influence, the reason why many of them started feeling uncomfortable speaking their native language with their friends (Worthy, 2003). Evidently, bilingual education is an asset to our country and the benefits can be seen throughout our global economy.People such as Giuliani should embrace the intellection of this type of education and should help fund programs as it will doubtlessly further enrich our economy. In addition, why should students loose their native language simply for the reason that the majority of people speak English? The ability to speak multiple languages enables them for future aspirations, success, and priority over those who can only speak only English fluently. Our society extremely benefits from bilingual education and there no significant reason for eliminating it.All in all, bilingual education in public schools is definitely not a threat to an official language or unity of the count ry. Nor it is a waste of funds since it is so essential in childrens first years of education. ESL classes do not slow down assimilation, and even if in some cases American culture is so diverse that even abolishing all programs helping immigrants to maintain their language will not have a great impact on American melting pot. Instead, English-only initiatives have only negative consequences for limited-English proficient groups and their interaction with the dominant society (Barker, 2001).Abolishing bilingual education in schools will not create an intense for immigrants to learn English, but most likely will result in protests, racial conflicts, even prejudice against minority groups, and that is a certain way to dissolve a country. References August, D. , & Garcia E. E. (1988). Language minority education in the United States. Springfield, IL Thomas. Barker, Valerie, Howard Giles, Kimberly Noels, Julie Duck, Michael Hecht, and Richarde Clement. (Mar 2001). The English-only movem ent A communication analysis of changing perceptions of language vitality.Journal of Communication,51 (1), 3. Proquest. DeVry University, Federal Way, WA. Retrieved February 3, 2006 from httpwww. il. proquest. compdauto. Chavez, Linda. (1995, April 2). Bilingual education was to teach English, not trap students. Minneapolis Star Tribune, 23. Conklin, N. F. , & Lourie, M. A. (1983). A host of tongues Language communities in the United States. New York The Free Press. Fishman, J. A. , & Markman, B. R. (1979). The ethnic mother-tongue school in America Assumptions, findings, directory. New York Ferkauf Graduate School, Yeshiva University. Heath, S. B. (1976).A national language academy Debate in the new nation. International Journal of the Sociology of Language, 47(11), 9-43. Heath, S. B. (1981). English in our language heritage. In C. A. Ferguson & S. B. Heath (Eds. ), Language in the U. S. A. (pp. 6-20). Cambridge, UK Cambridge University Press. Johnson, G. W. (1949). Our English he ritage. Philadelphia Lippincott. Keller, G. D. , & Van K. S. Hooft. (1982). A chronology of bilingualism and bilingual education in the United States. In J. A. Fishman & G. D. Keller (Eds. ), Bilingual education for Hispanic students in the United States (pp. 3-19).New York Teachers College, capital of South Carolina University. Kenig, Graciela. (1998). The best careers for bilingual latinos Market your fluency in Spanish to get ahead on the job. McGraw-Hill. Kleinfeld, J. S. (1979). Eskimo school on the Andreafsky A study of effective bicultural education. New York Praeger. Lyons, J. J. (1990). The past and future directions of federal bilingual education policy. In C. B. Cazden & C. E. Snow (Eds. ), English plus Issues in bilingual education (pp. 66-80). Newbury Park, CA Sage. Macswan, Jeff. (1998, August 6). Bilingual education an asset that can offer global rewards.Arizona Republic. Retrieved February 4, 2006 from www. onenation. org/0898/080698. html Met, M. , & Galloway, V. (1 992). Research in foreign language curriculum. In P. Jackson (Ed. ) Handbook of research on curriculum (pp. 852-890). New York Macmillan. Mujica, Maero E. (2003, Dec). why the US needs an official language. The World and I, 18(12), 36. Proquest. Devry University, Federal Way, WA. Retrieved February 4, 2006 from http//www. il. proquest. com/pdauto Ovando, Carlos J. (Spring 2003). Bilingual education in the United States Historical development and current issues.Bilingual Research Journal 27(1), 1, 25. Proquest. DeVry University, Federal Way, WA. Retrieved February 4, 2006 from httpwww. il. proquest. compdauto. Pratt, Chasity. (2000, April 4). One class, two languages Both English, foreign benefit bilingual schools. Newsday, 6. Rojas, E. D. & Reagan, T. (Winter 2003). Linguistic human rights A new perspective on bilingual education. Educational Foundations 17(1), 5. Proquest. DeVry University, Federal Way, WA. Retrieved February 4, 2006 from httpwww. il. proquest. compdauto Schaefer, Richard T. (2003).Sociology A Brief introduction. McGraw Hill New York Willen, Liz. (1998, January, 16). Bilingual debate Rudys push to limit education programs draws flak. Newsday, 8. Wood, Daniel B. (1997, July 30). side by side(p) big push from California No bilingual education. The Christian cognition Monitor United States. Retrieved February 4, 2006 from http//csmweb2. emcweb. com/durable/1997/07/03/us/us. 1. html Worthy, J. , Alejandra Rodriguez-Galindo, Lori Czop Assaf, Leticia Martinez and Kimberly Cuero. (Summer 2003). Fifth-grade bilingual students and precursors to subtractive