Saturday, February 23, 2019
Objectives of Firms Essay
Standard possibleness assumes that moving ines have sufficient culture, market power and (importantly) motivation to set prices for their products that maximize meshings This assumption is now heavily criticised by economists who have canvass the organisation and object glasss of modern-day corporations.Not and do most line of merchandisees ofttimes move away from gross(a) profit- collide withking behaviour, many argon organised and operated in a way where profit is non the only objective. Key slur There will always be a range of telephone circuit objectives 1. Profit maximisation (where MR=MC)2. Revenue maximisation ( gross sales taxation) where MR=zero3. Increasing and defend market sh be4. Surviving an economic downturn / recession5. engage ethical phone line objectives (corporate social responsibility) 6. Providing a public service see later sections on nationalised (state-owned) industries Why efficacy a business change from profit maximisation?Some explanati ons relate to the lack of accurate information required to set profit maximising prices. Others concentrate on the alternative objectives of businesses. Imperfect informationIt might be hard for a business to pinpoint their profit maximising siding, as they cannot accurately calculate b atomic number 18(a) tax & cost. Day-to-day pricing decisions ar interpreted on the bottom of estimated demand or rules of thumb. A business might estimate to add a profit margin on top of bonny cost cost-plus pricing. Multi-product businessesMost businesses ar multi-product firms operating in a range of markets across countries and continents the volume of information that they have to hatch can be vast. And they must keep track of the ever-changing preferences of consumers. The liking that there is a neat, single profit maximising price is redundant. behavioural Theories of the FirmBehavioural economists believe that large-scale businesses are complex organizations make up of various st akeholders i.e. gatherings who have a vested interest in the use of a business. Examples include Managers employed by a business and other employeesShareholders people who have an equity stake in a business CustomersThe government and its agencies including local government Each group is in all likelihood to have different objectives or goals at points in time. The dominant group at any moment can give greater dialect to their own objectives for example price and output decisions may be taken at a local level by managers with shareholders taking only a distant and imperfectly informed view of the companys performance and strategy.If firms are likely to move away from pure profit maximising behaviour, what are the alternatives? 1. Satisficing behaviour is a term first coined by economist Hugo Simon when faced with a decision where the cost of identifying and pursuing the best choice is high. For business owners this might mean moving away from pure profit maximisation and c hoosing instead to aim for minimum acceptable levels of skill in terms of tax income and profit. 2. Sales Revenue MaximisationThe objective of maximising sales revenue rather than dough was certain by William Baumol whose work focused on the behaviour of manager-controlled businesses. Baumol argued that annual salaries and perks are associate to total sales revenue rather than profits. Companies geared towards maximising revenue are likely to make extensive use of price unlikeness to extract extra revenue and profit from consumers.A firm might also aim to tap sales revenue rather than profits because it wishes to deter the entry of new firms. If a firm decides to aim to maximise sales revenue rather than profits, one of the consequences might be a reduction in the price of the firms shares 3. Managerial contentment modelAn alternative view was put forward by Oliver Williamson (1981), who developed the concept of managerial satisfaction (or managerial utility). This can be c ompound by raising sales revenue.Assuming that the firms cost remain the same, a firm will choose a set down price and supply a high output when sales revenue maximisation is the main objective. The profit maximising price is P1 at output Q1, the revenue maximising price is P2 at output Q2 Consumer surplus is higher with sales revenue maximisation because output is higher and price is lower. manufacturing business surplus is greater when profits are maximised.Social EntrepreneursMichael Porter share Value and the Limitations of CSRNarrow views about how to create profit has created disconnect mingled with businesses and society and needs to change according to Harvard Business School prof Michael Porter. A growing number of companies known for their hard-nosed approach to businesssuch as GE, Google, IBM, Intel, Johnson & Johnson, Nestl, Unilever, and Wal-Marthave already embarked on efforts to create shared value by looking again at the intersection between society and corpora te performance.Shared value is creating economic value by creating social value In recent times, creating value has tended to focus on short-termist thinking Businesses have been long on driving huge sales and output volumes, downsize and de-layering inefficient management and generally responding to pressure from financial markets to go to bed immediate results through cost-cutting, dynamic pricing and increasingly tough marketing that can often persuade people to buy things that are not good for them.This involves a recalibration and a rethinking about what a product truly is and what needs a business is meeting, for example in the food industry, products that are nutritious and healthy rather than focus on volume, lower social unit costs and higher profits. He notes to increasing prominence of social entrepreneurs with revenue generating business models. Consumers looking at the world differently and expressing their preferences in unafraid ways this is already having a di rect effect on supermarket behaviour.A social enterprise is a business that has social objectives whose profits are reinvested for that purpose in the business or the community, rather than being compulsive by the need to seek profit to satisfy investors. Social entrepreneurs are looking to achieve social and environmental aimsNot for Profit BusinessesThese are charities, community organisations that are run on commercial lines e.g. Network cut Network running Their stated purpose is to deliver a safe, true(p) and efficient railway for Britain They employ over 35,000 people with annual round costs in excess of 1.6bn It is a company limited by guarantee whose debts are secured by the government Network school operates as a commercial business and regulated by the Office of Rail Regulation Network Rail is a not-for-dividend company profits are invested in the railway engagement.Train operating companies (TOCs) pay Network Rail for use of the rail infrastructure They are given targets for punctuality and resortIn 2011 Network Rail made profits of 750 million. It receives an annual indemnity from the UK government in excess of 5 billion. Businesses required to main a loss-making serviceA good example here is the Royal get by which is required to maintain a universal national postal address service throughout the UK for a uniform price. Household mail makes a loss, cross-subsidised by business mail although this market is shrinking for the Royal hop out because of the introduction of fresh competition from 2006. The Post Office Ltd is a adjunct of the Royal Mail Group plc it runs substantial losses on the network or rural post offices and has been under great pressure to fold hundreds of offices to stem losses.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment