The O.J. Simpson Trial Essays -- Simpson Trial Murder Case Essays

The O.J. Simpson Trial On June 12,1994, Nicole Brown Simpson and Ronald Goldman were murdered. Their bodies were discovered outside Nicole Simpsons condominium. Nicole Simpson was the estranged wife of the famous football player and T.V. star O.J. Simpson. The people directly involved with this case are Judge Lance Ito, the pursuance lawyers, Marcia Clark and Christopher Darden, the defense lawyers, Johnnie Cochran, Robert Shapiro and Robert Blasier , the jury and the defendant, O.J. Simpson. The families of the victims hold in in any case been present in the courtroom, as well as other spectators and news program media. This case has heard one hundred and twenty witnesses over a nine month period.The prose push asideions physical evidence includes a blinking(a) glove, bloody socks, hair, and fibres and a trail of blood drops connecting the crime scene and O.J.s estate. Defence lawyers place this physical evidence means nothing because it was either purposely taint or contami nated. Kenneth Berris testified that two wash bags are still missing from Simpsons pelf hotel room. The bloody clothes and murder instrument have never been appoint.The prosecution says DNA tests place Simpsons genetic markers on the drops of blood leading forth from the bodies. There were also blood samples, similar to Simpsons and the victims, found on O.J.s bronco truck. Simpsons blood was also found on his driveway and his foyer. The prosecution says Simpson cut his hand during the murder. The defence says Simpson cut his hand when he reached for his phone in his Bronco and later cut his hand on a glass. The important focus of the defence is the contamination of physical evidence. Roger Martz testified, for the prosecution, that the blood he well-tried contained no significant amounts of EDTA. He said the blood found at the crime scene didnt come from a test tube with special(prenominal) preservatives used at a crime lab. Defence lawyer Robert Blazier filed papers stati ng that Roger Martz has a habit and custom of changing F.B.I. reports, removing helpful defense discipline and has falsely testified in a number of cases. Microbiologist, John Gerdes, testified that he found sloppiness so serious at the LAPD lab that it could have allowed impertinent DNA to be introduced into evidence samples. He showed pictures of the lab where test tubes were jot each other which could cause the contamination. Gerdes also... ...s claimed I did not, could not and would not have committed this crime. My idea about this case is that O.J. Simpson is guilty. The defence tries to say in that respect was all this conspiracy to frame O.J. but I dont think they turn up any of this happened. The defence said Furhman was a racist but this does not prove that Simpson didnt commit the crime. They say the blood samples were contaminated but I dont think every single one was. The prosecution proved he was an abuser and I think something finally snapped inside him and he k illed Nicole and Goldman. The gloves the orca wore were the same type O.J. wears. When they say O.J. tried on the gloves and they didnt fit I think he tightened his hand up so the gloves would be unsaid to put on. The shoeprints at the crime scene were the same style and coat he wears. Bloody clothes or a murder weapon have never been found but neither has the missing laundry bags from O.J.s hotel room. I have to wonder why O.J. lead the police on a big chase if he is so darn innocent. My opinion is that O.J. Simpson would have been found guilty a long time past if it wasnt for all the publicity surrounding the case and the fact that hes famous.